[oe] [PATCH][meta-oe] systemd: add postrm u-a calls

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 03:15:17PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:22:12AM +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> > * Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> [111110 08:57]:
> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> > > > * Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> [111109 20:25]:
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb |   11 +++++++++--
> > > > >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > > > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > > > index 90862a3..d1d4306 100644
> > > > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > > > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ inherit gitpkgv
> > > > >  # TODO:
> > > > >  # u-a for runlevel and telinit
> > > > > -# u-a prerm
> > 
> > > > Here on your todo list, it stated u-a for prerm, but you applied it to
> > > > the postrm. In this case, it probably doesn't really matter, but I'd
> > > > still guess that it would make more sense to remove the u-a before
> > > > removing the binaries. Although, I don't think it'll actually cause any
> > > > problems in this case.
> > 
> > > I did what u-a.bbclass usually do.. if you think it should be in prerm
> > > then it would be best to first fix in u-a.bbclass and then we can update
> > > the rest of metadata.
> > 
> > Yeah, like I said, is't likely not a real problem. There'll probably
> > just be a tiny window during which, in this case, e.g. reboot isn't
> > available, before u-a has been told to change the reboot link.
> > 
> > I'm currently just a little bit catious as I've recently stumbled upon
> > post-/prerm issues using rpm... (Although the ones I know of (busybox
> > updates, rsyslog removal) are either fixed or there has been patches
> > submitted).
> 
> So should I change postrm to prerm in this patch or is there other
> reason why it wasn't applied yet?

ping

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20111121/78289f0b/attachment-0002.sig>