[oe] Performance measurement: Building openembedded-core with and without overclocking on C-i7 2600K

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Oct 17 22:13:22 UTC 2011


On 10/17/2011 1:44 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> If anyone is interested...
>

thanks for numbers. Is there statistics on 64bit host Vs. 32bit build 
host available too ?

> Same machine in two different configurations.
>
> .........................................................#1...........................#2
>
> P8Z68V Pro
> Core-i7 2600K @ 3.4 GHz..................4.4 GHz
> 8 GB @ ...........................................1333
> MHz...............1640 MHz
> 1TB WD Black 7200 RPM
> Ubuntu 11-10
>
> Almost all source code already in source directory
>
> Building meta-toolchain is 13% faster with overclocking.
>
>
> #1
> build: meta-toolchain
> START 10:46:23 55:52
> FINISH 11:42:15
> build: core-image-minimal
> START 11:42:15 17:34
> FINISH 11:59:49
> build: core-image-sato
> START 13:40:47 01:19
> FINISH 13:42:06
> Build fails, since one package could not be downloaded.
> build: meta-toolchain-sdk
> START 13:42:06 00:38
> FINISH 13:42:44
> build: adt-installer
> START 13:42:44 00:03
> FINISH 13:42:51
> build: meta-ide-support
> START 13:42:51 01:13
> FINISH 13:44:04
>
>
>
> #2
> build: meta-toolchain
> START 20:18:51 49:19 (vs 55:52)
> FINISH 21:08:10
> build: core-image-minimal
> START 21:08:10 16:38 (vs 17:34)
> FINISH 21:24:48
> build: core-image-sato
> START 21:24:48 15:38 (vs 01:19 - I think I have a problem in the first
> build)
> FINISH 21:40:26
> build: meta-toolchain-sdk
> START 21:40:26 00:59 (vs 00:38)
> FINISH 21:41:25
> build: adt-installer
> START 21:41:25 00:03 (vs 00:03)
> FINISH 21:41:28
> build: meta-ide-support
> START 21:41:28 01:03 (vs 01:13)
> FINISH 21:42:31
>
>
>





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list