[oe] [PATCH] 2011.03-maintenance: Bad checksums in binutils-cross-sdk_2.18.bb

[Mats Kärrman]

Paul,

I think Denys is correct in saying that "my" fix is a fix to a slightly different problem (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/48425) . The way the included binutils_2.18.bb was fixed may be wrong and require an additional fix though. I'll look into this.

BR // Mats
________________________________________
From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org [openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Paul Menzel [paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 10:45 PM
To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] 2011.03-maintenance: Bad checksums in binutils-cross-sdk_2.18.bb

Dear Ulf,


Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 17:05 +0200 schrieb Ulf Samuelsson:
> 2011-10-21 12:16, Paul Menzel skrev:

> > Am Freitag, den 21.10.2011, 06:42 +0000 schrieb Mats Kärrman:
> >
> >> My first patch, please be gentle if i did something wrong ;)
> > our commit policy describes how patches should be formatted [1][2]. Most
> > importantly you forgot your Signed-off-by line.
> >
> >> The following patch is from a local branch tracking
> >> 2011.03-maintenance, should it be done different?
> I did a similar fix for binutils-2.20.1, and that is apparently not the way
> so this was rejected. (See other discussions on binutils this week).
>
> I sent a new version of binutils-2.20.1 patch today,
> which is taken from openembedded-core, and that
> combines the new checksums, with downloading a new tarball.
>
> If it follows the same scheme, then:
> binutils-2.18.tar.bz2 is only a link to binutils-2.18a.tar.bz2
> Your SRC_URI should be pointing at binutils-${PV}a.tar.bz2

you describe indeed the correct fix. Unfortunately the “wrong” fix was
already committed so I just continued on this track. I also noted that
in my commit message.

Ulf thank you for the correct fix for 2.20.1 and Mats, if you have some
time it would be great if you could send a patch for what Ulf proposed.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul


> > [1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Policy
> > [2] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Category:Policy
> > [3] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/2011.03-maintenance
> > [4] http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=f2d53aa074d76509384e7bb8a9c39e2e27210f4a