[oe] [meta-efl][meta-oe 05/12] id3lib: Import from openembedded classic

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2011/10/31 Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 31-10-11 22:18, Philip Balister schreef:
> > On 10/31/2011 01:48 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 31-10-11 17:24, Paul Menzel schreef:
> >>> Am Montag, den 31.10.2011, 11:50 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> >>>> Op 29-10-11 14:33, Paul Menzel schreef:
> >>>>> Dear Martin, dear Denis,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am Samstag, den 29.10.2011, 12:29 +0200 schrieb Martin Jansa:
> >>>>>> From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo at no-log.org>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Added LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, and fixed LICENSE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo at no-log.org>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NACK.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> please add the version you import and the commit ID you import
> >>>>> from. This is all written in the guide lines [1]!
> >>>>
> >>>> And as I've said before, meta-oe is not oe-dev, so you can't use
> >>>> take the old 'rules' and apply them to meta-oe 1:1!
> >>
> >>> The guide lines I referred to [1] have been written for OE-core. ;-)
> >>
> >> Yes, and oe-core still isn't meta-oe
> >
> > Why would we need different guidelines?
>
> Different goals I guess. And I don't trust a ruleset that's in a wiki, too
> much room for people coming in and messing it up.
>
> As far as I recall the idea was that meta oe should follow the same
guidelines as oe core.
When was this changed?
Who decided this?
And if there need to be different guidelines, I feel it is useful to
document them somewhere (and probably also why it deviates from oe-core).

Anyway, I think I start to understand why so few people are willing to
contribute to meta-oe.

Have fun! Frans.