[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] xf86-video-omapfb: add patch for fixing segfault on starting X when using VRFB

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le 01/09/2011 17:50, Martin Jansa a écrit :
> > From: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak<dos at dosowisko.net>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   .../0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch                 |  320 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >   .../xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb_git.bb           |    3 +-
> >   2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb/0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch
> >
> why does this driver is inside meta-oe layer instead of the TI layer ?

mostly because N900 also using xf86-video-omapfb is not built by TI :)
 
> btw, as we are starting porting our bsp against meta-oc, is there a document 
> describing how the layers are splitted ?
> 
> Eric
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110902/8d9f8ab5/attachment-0002.sig>