[oe] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again.

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 07:08:28 UTC 2011


On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> > Op 02-09-11 21:29, Andreas Müller schreef:
> > > On Friday, September 02, 2011 08:48:38 PM Phil Blundell wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > >>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie:
> > >>>> I do find the split useful...
> > >>> 
> > >>> Hmm, could you please elaborate?
> > >> 
> > >> Not that I'm Richard, but I do find the split useful as well. 
> > >> Personally I am much less interested in the traffic on the oe-devel
> > >> list and I often ignore that one; I've been somewhat tempted to just 
> > >> unsubscribe altogether since there doesn't appear to be all that much
> > >> of value (to me) going on there.
> > 
> > > I would even prefer having additional meta-oe list separated from
> > > oe-dev.
> > 
> > If there's enough need for it, that can get arranged.
> 
> Why should that be needed? Maybe proposals could be explained and backed
> up with arguments for a discussion.

I don't care if it's all in one list or N > 2 separate lists because
I'll be subscribed to all and filter will merge all those e-mails to one
folder anyways..

But I see your point that it's harder to decide to which list(s) someone
should send his question..

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110903/587d880f/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list