[oe] [PATCH v2] linux-libc-headers 2.6.24: backport arm/asm/hwcap.h from recent kernels
Steffen Sledz
sledz at dresearch-fe.de
Tue Sep 13 09:58:59 UTC 2011
On 13.09.2011 11:45, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Steffen,
>
>
> Am Montag, den 12.09.2011, 17:26 +0200 schrieb Steffen Sledz:
>> This patch is similar to the one in linux-libc-headers 2.6.23 [1] and
>> enables building of OpenJDK which uses HWCAP_THUMBEE which normally
>> are not present in 2.6.24 headers.
>>
>> [1] commit 41cd62ffbac7d272d46a4b39faf8a97c0850dd10
>
> thank you for updating the patch and the commit message.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz <sledz at dresearch-fe.de>
>> ---
>> .../arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.24.bb | 5 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers-2.6.24/arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers-2.6.24/arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers-2.6.24/arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6975317
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers-2.6.24/arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>
> I am not sure about the policy in oe.dev, but could you add a patch
> header, please [1].
>
> Upstream-Status: Backport [2.6.(which one?)]
Marcin, can you write something to this? I just adapted your patch to the 2.6.24 headers.
>> +---
>> + include/asm-arm/hwcap.h | 4 ++++
>> + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> +
>> +--- linux-2.6.24.orig/include/asm-arm/hwcap.h
>> ++++ linux-2.6.24/include/asm-arm/hwcap.h
>> +@@ -13,10 +13,14 @@
>> + #define HWCAP_VFP 64
>> + #define HWCAP_EDSP 128
>> + #define HWCAP_JAVA 256
>> + #define HWCAP_IWMMXT 512
>> + #define HWCAP_CRUNCH 1024
>> ++#define HWCAP_THUMBEE 2048
>> ++#define HWCAP_NEON 4096
>> ++#define HWCAP_VFPv3 8192
>> ++#define HWCAP_VFPv3D16 16384
>> +
>> + #if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__ASSEMBLY__)
>> + /*
>> + * This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
>> + * instruction set this cpu supports.
>> diff --git a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.24.bb b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.24.bb
>> index 148d03f..cec1835 100644
>> --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.24.bb
>> +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.24.bb
>> @@ -2,13 +2,14 @@ require linux-libc-headers.inc
>>
>> INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
>> DEPENDS += "unifdef-native"
>> -PR = "r7"
>> +PR = "r8"
>>
>> SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
>> file://procinfo.h \
>> file://export_falloc_h.patch \
>> file://make-3.82.patch \
>> - file://unifdef.patch"
>> + file://unifdef.patch \
>> + file://arm-hwcap-add-new-entries.patch"
>
> To keep future patches smaller could you put the »"« on the new line
> please?
>
> ….patch \
> "
Yepp. No problem.
>> SRC_URI_append_hipox = " \
>> file://siocoutqsnd.patch \
>
> With these changes please add
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net>
>
> below your Signed-off-by line.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> [1] http://openembedded.org/index.php?title=Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines#Patch_Header_Recommendations
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz at dresearch-fe.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list