[oe] build meta-oe without systemd

[Chris Larson]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:59:38AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Op 04-04-12 00:17, Eric B??nard schreef:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> would that make sense to support systemd as a DISTRO_FEATURES ? That
>> >> would make builds using older udev (< 174) possible with meta-oe as this
>> >> actually fails because of systemd.
>> >
>> > We talked about this during the yocto bsp summit this week and I'm working
>> > on a patchset to send as RFC later this month (post 1.2 release):
>> >
>> > commit b98d45b1bc2d9cf9ba41629240e6c21f19ddceff
>> > Author: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>> > Date:   Tue Apr 3 14:13:59 2012 -0700
>> >
>> >    meta-systemd: move over systemd from meta-oe
>> >
>> >    Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>> >
>> > commit 59c57bd73d1f157dfada233df889852fdb4a692f
>> > Author: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>> > Date:   Tue Apr 3 14:12:42 2012 -0700
>> >
>> >    meta-systemd: create layer
>> >
>> >    Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>>
>>
>> Woot! We can stop using BBMASK to exclude bbappends from meta-oe when
>> this happens :)
>
> You should have been at the BSP Summit, especially as it was hosted at
> Mentor. :) That was one of the important decisions made, but this topic
> in particular was being discussed for a while... So, I second your Woot! :)

Yeah, I wanted to make it, but unfortunately wasn't able to. Will
probably be there next time around.
-- 
Christopher Larson