[oe] [PATCH] opkg-utils: Update SRC_URI to git.yoctoproject.org

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:44:17PM +0200, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> Le 11-Apr-12, Martin Jansa a écrit:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:46:32PM +0200, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> > > This updates SRC_URI as the svn.openmoko.org repository is now down.
> > > All the changes of this patch were picked from oe-core and brought
> > > over.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli <apelete at seketeli.net>
> > > ---
> > >  .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/add-license-field.patch  |   39 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../opkg-utils/arfile_header_split.patch           |   10 +++++
> > >  .../opkg-utils/index-ignore-filenotfound.patch     |   19 ++++++++
> > >  recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch      |    3 ++
> > >  recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/shebang.patch        |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb               |   31 +++++++++++++
> > >  recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb               |   27 ------------
> > >  7 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/add-license-field.patch
> > >  create mode 100644 recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/shebang.patch
> > >  create mode 100644 recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb
> > >  delete mode 100644 recipes/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_svn.bb
> > 
> > All those patches were sent as git patches for git.yoctoproject.org.. so 
> > you can ping yocto ML to apply them sooner then after 1.2 release to make this patch
> > a bit smaller :).
> > 
> > See
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2012-March/007851.html
> 
> Sorry for the giant patch, I wasn't sure if I should split it since
> the patch files in the commit are needed for the recipe to work.
> 
> Concerning the patches sent to the yocto ML, we may have a
> misunderstanding here.
> This patch I sent is picked from oe-core and I would like someone to
> review it and ultimately apply it to *oe-classic* (I need it for the
> jlime distribution, which is only available in oe-classic for now).
> It seemed to me that the yocto project is based on oe-core, so I don't
> understand why I should get in touch with them to get some part of the
> changes applied on their side (of oe-core, if I am not mistaken).

To get those changes applied in 
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/opkg-utils/

so that you would just use newer SRCREV with all those patches already
applied in upstream git repo without any local patches needed (the same
change - removal of local patches in favor of newer SRCREV will happen
in oe-core too after it's applied in opkg-utils repo).

> I probably missed some point you were trying to make, could you tell
> me how to get this into oe-classic ?

I know this was for oe-classic.. hope it's clearer now..

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20120412/6c67171d/attachment-0002.sig>