[oe] [oe-commits] Otavio Salvador : systemd.bbclass: depends on systemd

[Martin Jansa]

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:30:37PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:14, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Can we move this only to packages which are really depending on systemd
> > compiled?
> >
> > I have use-case where
> > small cpio image has busybox
> > busybox depends on systemd just because of this
> > systemd depends on kernel (because RRECOMMENDS on modules)
> > kernel depends on that cpio image which is used as ramdisk
> >
> > So in order to finish cpio.do_rootfs I have to finish kernel and kernel
> > fails to build because doesn't have cpio available yet (DEPENDS = "cpio"
> > is not enough because doesn't need do_rootfs to finish AFAIK).
> >
> 
> I understand your use case but it seems in this case you ought to override
> it in a bbappend. It doesn't seems right as this is the exception, not the
> rule. If we don't depends on it, we can end with the binaries being not
> available in case a rootfs generation.

Which recipes really depend on systemd during build? I know about
polkit, something else?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20120203/fbe4b146/attachment-0002.sig>