[oe] future branch

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fcntl{,64} is a nightmare, yes. But your hunk does not strike me as
> immediately helpful.
> arm/ioperm hidden def removal is OK, I think, without having sources at
> hand.
> The socketcall hunk is nonsense, see my previous reply to Peter in this
> thread.
>
> +-# provided via pthreads builddir +-CSRC-y := $(filter-out $(libc_a_CSRC)
> $(notdir $(libpthread_libc_OBJS:.o=.c)),$(CSRC-y)) +-SSRC := $(filter-out
> $(libc_a_SSRC) $(notdir $(libpthread_libc_OBJS:.o=.S)),$(SSRC))
> Huh? Sounds inappropriate to me.
> Oh, filtering later on makes sense, so OK, good catch!
>
> +-ifeq ($(IS_EABI),y) ++ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_EABI),y)
> But _that_ is a step backwards, NACK.

yes most of my patches are cobbled up on top to get to a compiling
state so it could be
a garbage to hide another garbage