[oe] [meta-xfce][PATCH] xfce4-power-manager: Add initial recipe for version 1.0.10.

[Andreas Müller]

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Peter Tworek <tworaz666 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2012 03:50 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Peter Tworek<tworaz666 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Run tested on netbook pro.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek<tworaz666 at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb                  |   28
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644
>>>> meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
>>>>
>>>> diff --git
>>>> a/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
>>>> b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..4641178
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++
>>>> b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-power-manager/xfce4-power-manager_1.0.10.bb
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
>>>> +DESCRIPTION = "Power manager for the Xfce desktop environment"
>>>> +HOMEPAGE =
>>>> "http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-power-manager"
>>>> +SECTION = "x11"
>>>> +
>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
>>>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f6552"
>>>> +
>>>> +inherit xfce
>>>> +
>>>> +DEPENDS = "gtk+ glib-2.0 dbus-glib xfconf libxfce4ui libxfce4util
>>>> libnotify \
>>>> +           libxrandr virtual/libx11 libxext xfce4-panel"
>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "networkmanager udisks upower polkit"
>>>> +
>>>> +EXTRA_OECONF = " \
>>>> +    --enable-polkit \
>>>> +    --enable-network-manager \
>>>
>>> networkmanager conflicts with conman. I don't if this makes sense to
>>> use conman with xfce (am using networkmanager too). What happens if
>>> this option is not set?
>>
>>
>> Haven't tested it (yet), but I think it should work fine without
>> networkmanager, event when it's enabled. You'll probably see some warnings
>> in you logs, saying that it can't contact it via dbus, but that should be
>> it. Anyway I'll try to verify my theory...
You are right: I cross checked in source - so

Acked-by: Andreas Müller<schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>

Andreas