[oe] gcc-cross-initial patching fails

Andreas Müller schnitzeltony at googlemail.com
Wed Feb 22 21:39:43 UTC 2012


On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> <B29882 at freescale.com> wrote:
>>> Applying patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch
>>> patching file gcc/config/alpha/elf.h
>>> patching file gcc/config/ia64/linux.h
>>> patching file gcc/config/linux.h
>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -12 lines).
>>> patching file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 908.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
>>> Patch gcc45-no-add-needed.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
>>> ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch
>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>> /home/Superandy/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/temp/log.do_patch.5367
>>> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r45+svnr181733: task do_patch: Failed
>>> ERROR: Task 2829
>>> (/home/Superandy/data/oe-core/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb,
>>> do_patch) failed with exit code '1'
>>>
>>> git log does not help me much -  what goes wrong?
>>
>> Which actual patch is it failing on? Is there a conflict between
>> oe-core and meta-oe patch set against gcc?
>
> gcc45-no-add-needed.patch is the patch in question. I dont see
> anything wrong with it.
> Can you do bitbake -ccleanall gcc-cross-initial and redo bitbake
> gcc-cross-initial -cpatch ?
>
FYI: I removed the line which came in by the commits I mentioned above

should_apply[vardepsexclude] += "PN"

in openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc

and build from scratch works without issues.

Andreas




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list