[oe] [meta-xfce][PATCH] Add recipe for xarchiver 0.5.2.

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Peter Tworek <tworaz666 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 10:45 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Peter Tworek<tworaz666 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Run tested on netbookpro.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Tworek<tworaz666 at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../recipes-apps/xarchiver/xarchiver_0.5.2.bb      |   16
>>> ++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 meta-xfce/recipes-apps/xarchiver/xarchiver_0.5.2.bb
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-xfce/recipes-apps/xarchiver/xarchiver_0.5.2.bb
>>> b/meta-xfce/recipes-apps/xarchiver/xarchiver_0.5.2.bb
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..b2e5fb6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/meta-xfce/recipes-apps/xarchiver/xarchiver_0.5.2.bb
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>>> +DESCRIPTION = "Lightweight desktop independent, GTK+ archive manager"
>>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://xarchiver.sourceforge.net"
>>> +SECTION = "x11"
>>> +PR = "r0"
>>> +
>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f"
>>> +
>>> +DEPENDS = "gtk+ glib-2.0 xfce4-dev-tools"
>>
>> Do you need xfce4-dev-tools on the target or isn't
>> xfce4-dev-tools-native enough?
>
> Quick tested it and yeah, xfce4-dev-tools-native is enough. There are just
> needed for do_configure. Do you need another patch?

yes since they are picked from patchwork as it is. Please submit a V2