[oe] [PATCH 1/1] gtk+: Regenerate no-demos.patch and update recipe

[Apelete Seketeli]

Le 19-Jun-12, Martin Jansa a écrit:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:42:10AM +0200, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> > This fix regenerates the gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch file because the
> > targeted Makefile.am file changed since gtk+-2.10.1.
> > The gtk+_2.20.1.bb recipe is also updated to fix an issue where
> > no-demos.patch was not taken into account during the do_patch() stage.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Apelete Seketeli <apelete at seketeli.net>
> > ---
> >  recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch |    7 ++++---
> >  recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb             |    3 +--
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > index 0fc4c48..ac0730d 100644
> > --- a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > +++ b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+-2.20.1/no-demos.patch
> > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> > ---- gtk+-2.10.1/Makefile.am.orig	2006-08-08 12:37:30.000000000 +0100
> > -+++ gtk+-2.10.1/Makefile.am	2006-08-08 12:37:48.000000000 +0100
> > -@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > +--- gtk+-2.20.1/Makefile.am.orig	2012-06-18 22:40:19.348040648 +0200
> > ++++ gtk+-2.20.1/Makefile.am	2012-06-18 22:40:41.272149318 +0200
> > +@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >   ## Makefile.am for GTK+
> > + include $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.decl
> >   
> >  -SRC_SUBDIRS = gdk-pixbuf gdk gtk modules demos tests perf contrib
> >  +SRC_SUBDIRS = gdk-pixbuf gdk gtk modules tests perf contrib
> > diff --git a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > index 9cffee1..6e3c291 100644
> > --- a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > +++ b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.20.1.bb
> > @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
> >  require gtk+.inc
> >  
> > -SRC_URI_append_virtclass-native = " file://no-demos.patch \
> > -"
> >  SRC_URI_append = "file://gtk-dnd-grab-deadlock-fix.patch \
> >  		  file://cross-nm.patch \
> >  		  file://xkb-ifdef.patch \
> > +		  file://no-demos.patch \
> 
> I guess this was because demos were working for target case and were
> intentionally disabled only for native..

In my oe setup I did not build gtk+-native. I added gtk+-native to the
ASSUME_PROVIDED list in local.conf instead, and installed
libgtk2.0-dev on my host machine.
As a consequence, I faced this gtk+ issue while baking a target
package, not a native one.

Do you mean I shouldn't have fixed the issue the way I did ? What
would be the best course of action then ?

Regards.
-- 
        Apelete