[oe] [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:07:58 +0100,
> Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> > 
> > Why not move them?
> > 
> > Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to
> > bblayers and then move it in 2nd.
> > 
> > If it was copied just that people doesn't have to 
> > update bblayers at the same time as git pull from meta-oe.
> > 
> I think the next step is a patch removing them from meta-oe to make
> the change less intrusive than a one shot move and give people the
> time to update their bblayers.conf.

yup that's why I proposed to create empty, but valid meta-toolchain stub
so people can add it to bblayers.conf now and later we can populate it
by git move with whatever we decide we want :).

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20120322/54b31c33/attachment-0002.sig>