[oe] Openembedded and ld-linux-armhf.so.3

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 03-05-12 08:48, Martin Ertsås schreef:
> On 05/02/12 23:06, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On 05/02/2012 02:35 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote:
>>> The patches posted seems to be working fine. I at least didn't have 
>>> any problems with them.
>> 
>> 
>> thanks for trying them out. GCC patch is final but eglibc patch I still
>> got to improve that its not final version yet.
> 
> No problem. Is there also plans for renaming the toolchains created to 
> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when using hardfloats?

What's the point in that? Renaming the toolchain won't grant it magical
powers and setting a targetvendor is perfectly valid.

I've seen too many presentations this year at ELC and Collab where someone
says "renaming the toolchain fixed it" when they actually mean "using a
bare-metal toolchain for userspace doesn't really work".
Just look at the building the kernel with LLVM talk, a third of Marks
presentation was about challenges with calling the right toolchain with the
right arguments.

</rant>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=F3G4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----