[oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request 20120514

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:48:05PM +0000, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Denys Dmytriyenko [mailto:denis at denix.org]
> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 2:44 PM
> > To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > Cc: Maupin, Chase
> > Subject: Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request 20120514
> > 
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:09:40PM -0500, Chase Maupin wrote:
> > > Tom,
> > >
> > > Please pull the following commits that update the LICENSE field
> > to
> > > list the actual license version for licenses like GPL and LGPL.
> > These
> > > patches have previously been sent to the list with each patch
> > identifying
> > > where it was derived from.  I have also submitted patches for
> > oe-core where
> > > appropriate.
> > >
> > > I'm looking for feedback on how to properly mark a package as
> > having two
> > > licenses in oe-classic since "&" causes issues.  If these
> > patches are OK
> > > then they can be pulled.  If there is a better way to mark the
> > dual licensing
> > > then I'll update them accordingly.
> > 
> > As far as I recall, we don't use "&" in oe-classic for dual
> > licenses.
> > 
> > 
> > > The following changes since commit
> > 36a56cbb69cda0c89f478e01183d61c6a66525c9:
> > >   Steffen Sledz (1):
> > >         icedtea6-native-1.7.10: backport S7103224
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > >   http://arago-project.org/git/projects/arago-oe-amsdk.git
> > update-licenses
> > 
> > Also the same in different format:
> > 
> > Pull URL: git://arago-project.org/git/projects/arago-oe-amsdk.git
> >   Branch: update-licenses
> >   Browse: http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=arago-oe-
> > amsdk.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/update-licenses
> > 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com>
> 
> Ping on this pull request.  Any issues?

Since it's large I want to give folks the weekend to notice and comment
before I pull.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom