[oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request 20120514

[Maupin, Chase]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Menzel [mailto:paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 3:59 AM
> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Maupin, Chase
> Subject: Re: [oe] [2011.03-maintenance] Pull request 20120514
> 
> Dear Chase,
> 
> 
> Am Montag, den 14.05.2012, 13:09 -0500 schrieb Chase Maupin:
> 
> > Please pull the following commits that update the LICENSE field
> to
> > list the actual license version for licenses like GPL and LGPL.
> These
> > patches have previously been sent to the list with each patch
> > identifying where it was derived from.  I have also submitted
> patches
> > for oe-core where appropriate.
> >
> > I'm looking for feedback on how to properly mark a package as
> having
> > two licenses in oe-classic since "&" causes issues.  If these
> patches
> > are OK then they can be pulled.  If there is a better way to
> mark the
> > dual licensing then I'll update them accordingly.
> >
> > The following changes since commit
> 36a56cbb69cda0c89f478e01183d61c6a66525c9:
> >   Steffen Sledz (1):
> >         icedtea6-native-1.7.10: backport S7103224
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >   http://arago-project.org/git/projects/arago-oe-amsdk.git
> > update-licenses
> >
> > Chase Maupin (69):
> >       gnutls: update LICENSE setting
> 
> I would have liked to have split those up. Update the license and
> add the inherit line.

I'll split this up then and regenerate the patch set.

> 
> >       libtasn1: update LICENSE setting
> >       bonnie: Update LICENSE field version
> 
> It would have been great to have the changed license in the
> commit message also.
> 
> […]
> 
> >       schroedinger: Update LICENSE field version
> 
> A change in `schroedinger.inc` is preferred in my opinion.

I didn't change the .inc because I did not validate all versions of schroedinger.

> 
> […]
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul