[oe] [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1

[chunrongguo]

Hello,

  1. the following patches were accepted by inetutils 1.9.1 upstream
inetutils-1.8-0002-argp-fix-program_invocation_name-detection.patch
inetutils-1.8-1001-ftp-rename-ruserpass-to-avoid-C-library-collision.patch
inetutils-1.8-1002-rshd-detect-__rcmd_errstr-support-in-the-C-lib.patch
inetutils-1.8-1003-use-daemon-from-the-C-library-when-possible.patch
     inetutils-1.8-1004-detect-fork-support.patch
     inetutils-1.8-1005-ftpd-add-daemon-D-nommu-support.patch
2. the following patches were pending
inetutils-1.8-0001-printf-parse-pull-in-features.h-for-__GLIBC__.patch
     inetutils-1.8-0003-wchar.patch
     fix-disable-ipv6.patch

I will submit new patch for inetutils 1.9.1

thank you
chunrong


On 2012?11?19? 21:30, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] [meta-networking v5 ] inetutils : Update to 1.9.1] On 12.11.19 (Mon 08:34) Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Chunrong Guo <b40290 at freescale.com> wrote:
>>
>>>    * There are difference spaces between  inetutils-1.8/COPYING
>>>      and inetutils-1.9.1/COPYING,so md5sum is changed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo <b40290 at freescale.com>
>>>
>> I did not built or tested it but the commit log might be improved to
>> express what happened to the patches you removed. I assume they were fixed
>> upstream but it is not clear looking at the changes or commit log.
>>
>> Please make it explicit.
> I agree.  I only got do to a proper build test yesterday, and all seemed
> well, but I'd like to see the log expanded a bit as well.
>
> Almost there!  And thanks for the update to the new version, that's
> something I'd been thinking I was going to need to get to soon, so it's
> saving me some time.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel