[oe] [meta-efl] should epdfview really be under meta-efl?

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:33:42AM +0100, Marko Katić wrote:
> >> epdfview is a pure gtk app, yet it's under meta-efl/efl. Is this on
> >> purpose or did epdfview end up there
> >> due to it's name similarity to epdf ?
> >
> > I think so, CCing Andreas for confirmation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> 1. Where should be the new location?
> 2. I have no strong opinion on that - I asked here for the location
> before creating the recipe :)

What about meta-gnome?

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20121122/2b8c9644/attachment-0002.sig>