[oe] [meta-efl] should epdfview really be under meta-efl?

[Marko Katić]

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:41:34PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:33:42AM +0100, Marko Katić wrote:
>>> >> epdfview is a pure gtk app, yet it's under meta-efl/efl. Is this on
>>> >> purpose or did epdfview end up there
>>> >> due to it's name similarity to epdf ?
>>> >
>>> > I think so, CCing Andreas for confirmation.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> 1. Where should be the new location?
>>> 2. I have no strong opinion on that - I asked here for the location
>>> before creating the recipe :)
>>
>> What about meta-gnome?
>
> For meta-gnome evince might fit better.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

well, as it's name suggests, meta-efl should only contain efl libraries and
apps built with efl. meta-gnome might be good place for epdfview. But
then again, there's
a bunch of gtk apps in meta-oe/recipes-support, like gvim, fbreader,
pidgin xchat, etc.
To cut the story short, i myself am not sure where it should go.