[oe] [PATCHv5][meta-oe 1/2] liblockdev: new recipe, new version of libcec requires it

Andrei Gherzan andrei at gherzan.ro
Mon Sep 10 20:13:58 UTC 2012


On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:35 PM, <ml at communistcode.co.uk> wrote:

> From: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell at dbbroadcast.co.uk>
>
> V5
>
> - FILES_{PN} no loger required now libdir and includedir are passed to
> oe_runmake
>
> V4
>
> - Remove debian packaging patch, it is not needed
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <jack.mitchell at dbbroadcast.co.uk>
> ---
>  .../recipes-extended/liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bb  | 20
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/
> liblockdev_1.0.3.bb
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bbb/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/
> liblockdev_1.0.3.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..210a47b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "Manage character and block device lockfiles."
> +HOMEPAGE = "
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lockdev/lockdev.git;a=summary"
> +
> +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=d8045f3b8f929c1cb29a1e3fd737b499"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "
> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lockdev/lockdev_${PV}.orig.tar.gz
> "
> +
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "64b9c1b87b125fc348e892e24625524a"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "ccae635d7ac3fdd50897eceb250872b3d9a191d298f213e7f0c836910d869f82"
> +
> +S = "${WORKDIR}/lockdev-${PV}"
> +
> +do_compile() {
> +  oe_runmake CC="${CC}" LD="${LD}" shared
> +}
> +
> +do_install() {
> +  oe_runmake basedir="${D}" incdir="${D}${includedir}"
> libdir="${D}${libdir}" install_dev
> +}
>

Why install only _dev? Why don't you use make install? It makes no sense to
compile shared and not install it... I just tested your recipe.

ag



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list