[oe] New meta-cubox layer

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Thu Apr 4 05:53:41 UTC 2013


Op 3 apr. 2013, om 23:43 heeft Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> het volgende geschreven:

> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>> 
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>>> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning to
>>> hardfloat. Don't do that. If you want hardfloat, set that in your
>>> distro config, not in your machine config.
>>> 
>> 
>> This keeps coming up, but I do not see an answer that works for people
>> creating BSP's that work with just oe-core and a BSP layer.
>> 
>> How are we supposed to set TUNE parameters for this case? And yes,
>> this case *must* produce useful output.
> 
> I don't think TUNE is a distro thing. It is indeed a board setting and
> I expect every board to have a good know TUNE setting.

In OE classic it was called ARM_FLOAT_ABI, which shows it's a DISTRO thing. And furthermore, there is no real world performance difference between the default (softfp) and hardfloat. 



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list