[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/8] gateone: fix html5 feature check

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:33:10AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 
> Op 11 apr. 2013, om 00:04 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:14:18PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> The BlobBuilder and Blob checks never succeeded, even on cutting edge browsers. Nudge SRCREV forward to drag in those fixes.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
> >> ---
> >> meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb
> >> index 652876f..8133cf9 100644
> >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb
> >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb
> >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE.txt;md5=ee5b168fc7de89a0cadc49e27830aa2c"
> >> PR = "r9"
> >> 
> >> PV = "1.1"
> >> -SRCREV = "bb74e1095adb66b04b51ed6ff10ae0aa96afdd46"
> >> +SRCREV = "ea5db3dcb3bbbe445ae6d1a5611c1f8d547c57b9"
> > 
> > I'll at least bump PR in this one.
> 
> Wait, what? Isn't PRSERV mandatory nowadays?

Yes but for different SRCREV I would like to see it in something more
stable then PRSERV (e.g. to be able to compare .ipk files from different
builders and see which one has this newer SRCREV.)

Ideally add SRCPV to PV :).

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20130411/4eb4a518/attachment-0002.sig>