[oe] meta-systemd future vote Was: [meta-systemd][PATCH 1/2] Delete systemd class.

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 11:29:42 UTC 2013


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:02:55PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:51:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 10, 2013, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:50:41PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:25:34AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >>> > >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > good old meta-systemd should now parse again,
> > >>> > Thanks - will come back to test HEADs soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> But be aware that I've fixed only parsing of avahi and wpa-supplicant.
> > >>>
> > >>> I haven't tested it properly in runtime because my upgrade path is a bit
> > >>> broken (because I was building images with khem's patches for a while to
> > >>> test other stuff) and even clean build with failed to boot with
> > >>> qemux86-64 and I don't have time to debug it now.
> > >>>
> > >>> > > I wont apply this 2 commits
> > >>> > > until systemd discussion in oe-core is finished and future of
> > >>> > > meta-systemd decided.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > After systemd regression is worked around yocto 1.4 release regression
> > >>> > is knocking at the door...
> > >>>
> > >>> yes :/
> > >>>
> > >>> If we need to maintain meta-systemd bbappends for upgrade path we can
> > >>> also maintain them with PN-systemd packages and good old systemd
> > bbclass.
> > >>
> > >> Khem pinged me about this patch, so here are my thoughts:
> > >>
> > >> PN-systemd discussion in oe-core haven't moved a bit since this patch
> > >> was proposed, I think we have 2-3 options, lets vote about meta-systemd
> > future.
> > >>
> > >> 1) keep PN-systemd separation in meta-systemd and fixup .bbappends to
> > >> resolve issues created by oe-core (I've fixed some issues, but still a
> > >> lot of issues in postinst/postrm/prerm scripts when both inits are
> > >> sharing the same PN)
> > >>
> > >> 2) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and provide upgrade path
> > >> from PN-systemd to PN (mostly done by these 2 commits from khem).
> > >>
> > >> 3) give up on clean separation of PN-<init> and upgrade path (there are
> > >> many issues in other parts of oe-core, so upgrade path from danny to
> > >> dylan doesn't look usable.
> > >>
> > >> A) migrate existing .bbappends to their recipes to .bb files and
> > >> remove this layer. Any volunteer for that?
> > >>
> > >> My vote: 3) + A) later in 1.5
> > > A bit off-topic and mentioned here & there: I am working on
> > > network-manager(-applet) 0.9.8.0 update and xinput-calibrator. I could
> > > add 3) + A) for them if agreed. Hope to send them beginning of next
> > > week.
> > >
> > 
> > Sure I see no problem
> 
> OK, all systemd related changes should be now in master.
> 
> I'll do A) for meta-efl.
> 
> If someone starts working on A) for some other recipes, please write reply 
> here so that we don't duplicate work.

OK, I'll take care of A) for other layers too, just please review them.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20130413/c5157427/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list