[oe] [meta-gnome][PATCH 0/2] Remove some recipes that are in OE-Core (cover letter only)

[Martin Jansa]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:11:11PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 16:05:01 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > In case you're wondering why I've only sent the cover letter for just two
> > > patches, I tried sending them as normal and what I got was:
> > > 
> > > fatal: pull-29844/0001-hicolor-icon-theme-remove.patch: 29: patch contains
> > > a line longer than 998 characters warning: no patches were sent
> > > 
> > > They are just deletes though so they don't contain much in the way of
> > > substance.
> > 
> > libical is fine and I'll merge it shortly, but hicolor-icon-theme needs
> > PR bump in oe-core first (and in oe-core/dylan if you want it merged in
> > meta-oe before branching dylan).
> 
> If you'll accept an OE-Core PR bump for this can we do the same for the 
> bbappends that are preserved solely for keeping the same PR?

bbappens are a bit different, because this PR bump (would be nice to do
+2) does not need to happen atomically with meta-oe bb removal.

With bbappends it's possible that someone will upgrade oe-core with PR
bumps, build qt4-x11-free and then upgrade meta-oe without PRINCs and
build qt4-x11-free. But I'm willing to take that risk if we apply both
"close" :).

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20130416/54b0febc/attachment-0002.sig>