[oe] [RFC PATCH 01/13] meta-filesystems creation

Andrea Adami andrea.adami at gmail.com
Tue Aug 20 09:37:34 UTC 2013


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia at windriver.com> wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 04:36 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 19 August 2013 02:34, Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia at windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>> gitpkgv.bbclass is in meta-oe.
>>>
>> Is this the only part of meta-oe that meta-filesystems needs?  If it's
>> genuinely useful should we this be considered for oe-core?
>
> I am afraid not, libimobiledevice and samba are in meta-oe,
> and they are needed by meta-filesystems.
>
> ./recipes-filesystems/ifuse/ifuse_1.1.2.bb:6:DEPENDS = "fuse
> libimobiledevice"
> ./recipes-filesystems/smbnetfs/smbnetfs_git.bb:6:DEPENDS = "fuse samba"
>
>
>> (layers that depend on meta-oe bother me, especially when they depend on
>> just a tiny fraction of it)
>>
>> Ross


Right, it should be avoided,
see for example the case of cramfs needing two extra layers for no
particular reason...
I'm still of the opinion some should be moved to oe-core, at least the
ones involved in image creation.

Cheers

Andrea


>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list