[oe] [meta-oe][meta-systemd][PATCH] wpa-supplicant: Add bbappend to package systemd service in a -systemd package

Andreas Müller schnitzeltony at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 5 12:29:33 UTC 2013


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andrei Gherzan
<andrei.gherzan at windriver.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 12:49:43PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:02:19PM +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>> >> Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei.gherzan at windriver.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  .../wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant_2.0.bbappend     |    7 +++++++
>> >>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >>  create mode 100644 meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/wpa-supplicant_2.0.bbappend
>> >
>> > oe-core wpa-supplicant now installs wpa_supplicant.service to PN, is
>> > this SYSTEMD_PACKAGES correct now?
>> >
>
> Hmm... don't really understand your question. I know the service is installed in
> PN and by using SYSTEMD_PACKAGES="${PN}-systemd" I actually move that
> service in ${PN}-systemd.
>
>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2013-January/043675.html
>> >
>> > --
>> oe-core has set facts. The decision systemd or not is made by
>> DISTRO_FEATURE. I think we have to follow that (=let meta-systemd die)
>> to avoid two concurrent systemd enable mechanisms.
>
> I understand this and makes sense. But still, systemd services should be in a
> systemd package. Will resend this to oe-core.
>
Good luck :))

Andreas




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list