[oe] gtk errors in openembedded classis build

[Sankar H Malarmani]

Yes, you are right.. I removed those trailing slashes and now it throws me
new set of errors.. It was giving errors in RDEPENDS..
As suggested in wiki I replaced RDEPENDS with RRECOMMENDS in my
obconf_2.0.3+git.bb. But i'm getting the following list of errors.


ERROR: QA Issue:
/home/hc/oe-core/build/../stuff/oe-tworaz/meta-lxde/recipes-lxde/obconf/obconf_2.0.3+
git.bb: Variable RRECOMMENDS is set as not being package specific, please
fix this.
ERROR: Unable to parse
/home/hc/oe-core/build/../stuff/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/
wpa-supplicant_2.0.bb
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/hc/oe-core/stuff/openembedded-core/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py",
line 284, in better_exec(code=<code object <module> at 0xc07ab60, file
"<code>", line 1>, context={'d': <bb.data_smart.DataSmart object at
0xc071a0c>},
text='__anon_620__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_base_bbclass(d)\n__anon_20__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_debian_bbclass(d)\n__anon_20__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_blacklist_bbclass(d)\n__anon_227__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_package_bbclass(d)\n__anon_916__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_insane_bbclass(d)\n__anon_76__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_sstate_bbclass(d)\n__anon_474__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_openembedded_core_meta_classes_package_ipk_bbclass(d)\n__anon_83__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_meta_openembedded_meta_systemd_classes_systemd_bbclass(d)',
realfile='<code>'):
         try:
    >        exec(code, _context, context)
         except Exception as e:
  File "<code>", line 8, in <module>
  File
"__anon_83__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_meta_openembedded_meta_systemd_classes_systemd_bbclass",
line 2, in
__anon_83__home_hc_oe_core_build____stuff_meta_openembedded_meta_systemd_classes_systemd_bbclass(d=<bb.data_smart.DataSmart
object at 0xc071a0c>)
  File "systemd.bbclass", line 42, in
systemd_after_parse(d=<bb.data_smart.DataSmart object at 0xc071a0c>)
  File "systemd.bbclass", line 12, in systemd_check_vars
FuncFailed: Function failed:

/home/hc/oe-core/build/../stuff/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa-supplicant/
wpa-supplicant_2.0.bb inherits systemd but doesn't set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES

ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:

> On 14 February 2013 10:32, Sankar H Malarmani <sankar.m at hardcube.in>
> wrote:
> > ERROR: There is a confusing multiline, partially commented expression on
> > line 45 of file
> /home/hc/oe-core/build/../stuff/meta-toradex/recipes/images/
> > angstrom-lxde-image.bb ().
> > Please clarify whether this is all a comment or should be parsed.
>
> This means that there is a confusing multiline comment on line 45.
> This normally means this:
>
> # this is a comment \
>
> The trailing slash is ambiguous, so remove it.
>
> Ross
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards
*Sankar*
*Junior Programmer
*
*
*
*HardCube IT Consultancy Private Limited*
*II Floor , STPI - Software Technology Parks of India*
*5 Rajiv Gandhi Salai*
*Taramani, Chennai 600 113*
*Ph: 91 - 44 - 3918 0857*
*info at hardcube.in*
*http://www.hardcube.in*
**************
*"The contents of this E-mail (including the contents of the enclosure/(s)
or attachment/(s) if any) are privileged and confidential material of
HardCube IT Consultancy Private Limited, and should not be disclosed to,
used by or copied in any manner by anyone other than the intended
addressee/(s).If this E-mail (including the enclosure/(s) or attachment/(s)
if any) has been received in error, please advice the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. The views expressed in this E-mail message
(including the enclosure/(s) or attachment/(s) if any) are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,
states them to be the views of "HardCube"."*
***************