[oe] MACHINE_KERNEL_PR vs recipe PR

Ian Geiser igeiser at devonit.com
Thu Jan 31 13:08:05 UTC 2013


> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Martin Jansa
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:50 AM
> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] MACHINE_KERNEL_PR vs recipe PR
> 
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:20:25AM -0500, Ian Geiser wrote:
> > I am curious about the machine_kerne_pr class.  What is the
[...snip...]
> 
> OEBasicHash was only rebuilding external modules, but that does not
> upgrade them on target device.
> 
> Now with PR service it's not so important, but still useful because
> it's more reliable.
Okay, that makes sense.  For consistency's sake is there a best practices here?  Or is it left up to the preference of the kernel recipe maintainer?  Thanks! 





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list