[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] llvm3.2: new recipe

[Khem Raj]

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
<marcin at juszkiewicz.com.pl> wrote:
> W dniu 02.06.2013 11:33, Jonathan Liu pisze:
>> +def get_llvm_arch(d):
>> +    import bb;
>> +
>> +    arch = bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1)
>> +
>> +    if arch == "x86_64" or arch == "i486" or arch == "i586" or arch == "i686":
>> +        arch = "x86"
>> +    elif arch == "x86_64":
>> +        arch = "x86_64"
>> +    elif arch == "arm":
>> +        arch = "arm"
>> +    elif arch == "mipsel" or arch == "mips":
>> +        arch = "mips"
>> +    elif arch == "powerpc" or arch == "powerpc64":
>> +        arch = "powerpc"
>> +    else:
>> +        bb.warn("%s does not support %s yet" % (bb.data.getVar('PN', d, 1), arch) );
>> +
>> +    return arch
>
> Can we get rid of such blocks? They are worthless and only generate
> extra support questions when OE newbies use OE with 'not supported'
> architectures.

why do you think they are worthless ? when they give good information
instead of failing to build
and then generating support question which need more work to come to
same conclusion

> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel