[oe] [meta-gnome/meta-xfce 1/4] gdm: fix postinst-code to unbreak first boot issues

Andreas Müller schnitzeltony at googlemail.com
Fri May 3 11:44:30 UTC 2013


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:58:13PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Andreas Müller
>> <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Andreas Müller
>> > <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:33:57PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> >>>> Exiting postinst code leaves systemd.bbclass offline postinst code unexecuted,
>> >>>> causes postinst not to finish at first boot (gdm.service is not aliased to
>> >>>> display-manager.service -> started much too early) and is not neccesary:
>> >>>> language preparation can be done offline.
>> > Just learned that the chown code does not belong to do_install. Shall
>> > I send a V2 or a follow up?
>> I was too fast - it still discussed [1]
>
> Do you want me to apply these 4 and then add better fix in follow-up if
> needed? From that discussion it looks like you did all what you could in
> gdm :).
Yes please - otherwise I'll loose overview of patches around :)

Andreas




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list