[oe] [meta-qt5] Update to 5.1.1?

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Oct 7 20:15:36 UTC 2013


On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:37:39 -0400,
> > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:29:56PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Denys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:01:20 -0400,
> > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> a écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin, Otavio, et al,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you planning on updating Qt version in master to 5.1.1 any
> > > time soon,
> > > > > > > preferably before 1.5 release? :) If nobody looked into that yet,
> > > will you be
> > > > > > > open to take patches for the same?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I have 5.1.1 in test here. I expect to send the patch in the coming
> > > > > > days.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks! Sounds good. Let me know if you need help in testing!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > as soon as it finish to compile here I'll send the patch serie for
> > > > testing.
> > >
> > > +Laszlo
> > >
> > > Laszlo also said that he is working on patches for 5.1.1 I don't know
> > > how far he got..
> > >
> > 
> > Not any far, sorry, but I would be happy to use someone else's patches. By
> > the way, it would be nice to have 5.2.0 alpha (and later beta) updates
> > soon, too.
> 
> Having 5.2.0 alpha would be nice, but that's probably too unstable to try and 
> get in before Dora release. I want 5.1.1 as the latest stable to get into 
> Dora. :) So, I'm offering any help to expedite things like testing and such :)

I've already branched meta-qt5/dora before removing 5.0.2 recipes from
master.

I'm willing to "backport" 5.1.1 from master to dora or even remove 5.0.2
there as well, but last time I've asked around nobody responded to say
if they are still using 5.0.2 or 5.1.* is good enough for everybody.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20131007/fb0d7947/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list