[oe] [OE] [PATCH meta-networking] quagga/ripd: Fix two bugs after received SIGHUP signal

Xufeng Zhang xufeng.zhang at windriver.com
Mon Oct 28 03:37:01 UTC 2013


On 10/25/2013 09:31 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] [OE] [PATCH meta-networking] quagga/ripd: Fix two bugs after received SIGHUP signal] On 13.10.25 (Fri 09:47) Xufeng Zhang wrote:
>
>    
>> On 10/25/2013 01:44 AM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
>>      
>>> [[oe] [OE] [PATCH meta-networking] quagga/ripd: Fix two bugs after received SIGHUP signal] On 13.10.24 (Thu 17:48) Xufeng Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> There are two problems for ripd implementation after received
>>>> SIGHUP signal:
>>>> 1). ripd didn't clean up ifp->connected list before reload
>>>>      configuration file which makes the same advertise packet
>>>>      being sent multiple times(depends on how many SIGHUP was recieved).
>>>> 2). ripd reset ri->split_horizon flag to RIP_NO_SPLIT_HORIZON
>>>>      during restart which is different from the flag when ripd is
>>>>      firstly started up, leading to unnecessary route to be advertised.
>>>>
>>>> [YOCTO #5266]
>>>>          
>>> Hey Xufeng,
>>>
>>> Normally I wouldn't go this deep into the detail but since you
>>> referenced the Yocto bug and the Quagga discussion in the commit log and
>>> the bug itself, I thought I'd try to understand what's going on here.
>>> The last thing I saw from the Quagga maintainer is this:
>>>
>>>     The ifp->connected list contains connected prefixes of a given
>>>     interface. These exist regardless of particular routing protocols and
>>>     emptying the list during ripd reconfiguration would be plain wrong. I
>>>     allow for a chance there is a bug that is related to ifp->connected
>>>     and SIGHUP handling at once, but not in this specific way.
>>>        
>> What he said is that this ifp->connected list is exist in all
>> routing protocols,
>> and if it needs cleanup, it should be done in a more general way, such as
>> in zebra client which is independent of routing protocol.
>>      
> I'm not sure that's the interpretation I would have taken from the
> quoted text, but if what you indicate is what the maintainer meant, then
> is he not saying that the SIGHUP handling issue also exists for other
> routing daemons in the suite?
quoted the sentence:
"

The ifp->connected list contains connected prefixes of a given interface. These exist regardless of particular routing protocols and emptying the list during ripd reconfiguration would be plain wrong.

"
All the other daemons also refer to the ifp->connected list, and I have 
checked the SIGHUP handler code of all daemons,
except ospfd and ospf6d(they only print a log when SIGHUP is received), 
all the other daemons suffer the same problem as ripd since
they reload the configuration file.

> Are you saying a similar patch would then
> be required for potentially all daemons in quagga?
>    
Not all.

> Don't get me wrong, repairing one is better than repairing none, but on
> my first read of his comments it didn't seem like the maintainer even
> agreed that there was a bug at all and your interpretation suggests that
> the same bug likely impacts all quagga daemons.  Any sense on whether
> that's the case?
>    
"

I allow for a chance there is a bug that is related to ifp->connected and SIGHUP handling at once, but not in this specific way.

"
My understanding is that if there is a bug related to ifp->connected, we 
should not fix in such specific way.
Yes, the maintainer didn't agree that there is really a bug here, but 
this is really a abnormal behavior:
every time when SIGHUP is received, the same address is appended to 
ifp->connected list over and over again,
so if too much SIGHUP are received, there will be a flood for the 
advertised packets.


Thanks,
Xufeng

> -J.
>
>    
>> But I have specified the reasons in the above email that why it's
>> not easy to
>> implement this general way:
>> #########################################
>> More comments:
>> Generally this connected interface address stuff is cleaned up in
>> rip_interface_address_delete()
>> which is triggered by zsend_interface_address(), but just as the
>> annotation said above
>> zsend_interface_address() function in zebra/zserv.c,
>> ZEBRA_INTERFACE_ADDRESS_DELETE
>> message could only happens in two cases:
>> 1). ip address uninstall
>> 2). RTM_NEWADDR on routing/netlink socket
>>
>> It didn't take the SIGHUP signal into consideration, but since the
>> SIGHUP is handled
>> by every daemon independently, this cleanup is not easy to be
>> implemented commonly,
>> so I think this is a proper way to do this.
>> #########################################
>> So it needs to redesign a lot of stuff to implement this.
>>
>>      
>>> and it looks like the patch here is the same as the one that the
>>> maintainer indicated is "plain wrong".
>>>   Can you help me get some
>>> confidence that this isn't going to have negative side-effects if we
>>> integrate it?
>>>        
>> Yes, there should be no side-effects:
>> 1. This modification is only going into ripd daemon and it only
>> takes effect when ripd is restarting.
>> 2. The fix for problem 1). just remove the previously connected
>> addresses of the interface, and these
>>      connected addresses list will be reconstructed when ripd read
>> the configuration during restarting.
>> 3. The fix for problem 2). definitely has not any side-effect
>> because I just restore the horizon flag to
>>      the values when ripd daemon is firstly start up.
>>
>> And the customer has already test the fix for a lot of times, no
>> problem is found.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xufeng
>>
>>      
>>> -J.
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang<xufeng.zhang at windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch  |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   .../recipes-protocols/quagga/quagga.inc            |    3 +-
>>>>   2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/files/ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/files/ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/files/ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c081143
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/files/ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>>>> +ripd: Fix two bugs after received SIGHUP signal
>>>> +
>>>> +There are two problems for ripd implementation after received
>>>> +SIGHUP signal:
>>>> +1). ripd didn't clean up ifp->connected list before reload
>>>> +    configuration file.
>>>> +2). ripd reset ri->split_horizon flag to RIP_NO_SPLIT_HORIZON
>>>> +    which lead to the unnecessary route to be advertised.
>>>> +
>>>> +Upstream-Status: Pending
>>>> +
>>>> +Signed-off-by: Xufeng Zhang<xufeng.zhang at windriver.com>
>>>> +---
>>>> +--- a/ripd/rip_interface.c
>>>> ++++ b/ripd/rip_interface.c
>>>> +@@ -500,6 +500,8 @@
>>>> +   struct listnode *node;
>>>> +   struct interface *ifp;
>>>> +   struct rip_interface *ri;
>>>> ++  struct connected *ifc;
>>>> ++  struct listnode *conn_node, *next;
>>>> +
>>>> +   for (ALL_LIST_ELEMENTS_RO (iflist, node, ifp))
>>>> +     {
>>>> +@@ -514,6 +516,13 @@
>>>> + 	  thread_cancel (ri->t_wakeup);
>>>> + 	  ri->t_wakeup = NULL;
>>>> + 	}
>>>> ++
>>>> ++      for (conn_node = listhead (ifp->connected); conn_node; conn_node = next)
>>>> ++        {
>>>> ++          ifc = listgetdata (conn_node);
>>>> ++          next = conn_node->next;
>>>> ++          listnode_delete (ifp->connected, ifc);
>>>> ++        }
>>>> +     }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> +@@ -548,8 +557,8 @@
>>>> + 	  ri->key_chain = NULL;
>>>> + 	}
>>>> +
>>>> +-      ri->split_horizon = RIP_NO_SPLIT_HORIZON;
>>>> +-      ri->split_horizon_default = RIP_NO_SPLIT_HORIZON;
>>>> ++      ri->split_horizon = RIP_SPLIT_HORIZON;
>>>> ++      ri->split_horizon_default = RIP_SPLIT_HORIZON;
>>>> +
>>>> +       ri->list[RIP_FILTER_IN] = NULL;
>>>> +       ri->list[RIP_FILTER_OUT] = NULL;
>>>> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/quagga.inc b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/quagga.inc
>>>> index 89b9f7a..bf37067 100644
>>>> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/quagga.inc
>>>> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/quagga/quagga.inc
>>>> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ SRC_URI = "http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/quagga${QUAGGASUBDIR}/quagg
>>>>              file://quagga.default \
>>>>              file://watchquagga.init \
>>>>              file://watchquagga.default \
>>>> -           file://volatiles.03_quagga"
>>>> +           file://volatiles.03_quagga \
>>>> +           file://ripd-fix-two-bugs-after-received-SIGHUP.patch"
>>>>
>>>>   PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
>>>>   PACKAGECONFIG[cap] = "--enable-capabilities,--disable-capabilities,libcap"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>>>          
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>      
>    




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list