[oe] [PATCH] libhugetlbfs: add support for armv7a

[Khem Raj]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell at linaro.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell at linaro.org>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs_git.bb | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs_git.bb
> index 24480c3..4f1bfa4 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs_git.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs_git.bb
> @@ -20,10 +20,16 @@ SRC_URI = "git://git.code.sf.net/p/libhugetlbfs/code \
>
>  S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>
> -COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(x86_64|powerpc|powerpc64|aarch64).*-linux*"
> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(x86_64|powerpc|powerpc64|arm|aarch64).*-linux*"
>
> +python __anonymous() {
> +    if base_contains('TARGET_ARCH', 'arm', True, False, d):
> +        d.setVar('ARCH', 'armv7l')
> +    else:
> +        d.setVar('ARCH', d.getVar('TARGET_ARCH'))
> +}

instead of this fugly anon python you could do

ARCH_arm = "armv7l"
ARCH ?=  "${TARGET_ARCH}"

and btw. we support ARM v4,v5,v6 architectures as well. It seems your
patch only cares about armv7,
and if this recipe only works for armv7+ then dont open the floodgates
for all kind of arm architectures.

>
> -EXTRA_OEMAKE = "'ARCH=${TARGET_ARCH}' 'OPT=${CFLAGS}' 'CC=${CC}' BUILDTYPE=NATIVEONLY ${LIBARGS}"
> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = "'ARCH=${ARCH}' 'OPT=${CFLAGS}' 'CC=${CC}' BUILDTYPE=NATIVEONLY ${LIBARGS}"
>  CFLAGS += "-fexpensive-optimizations -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer -g0"
>
>  TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}"
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel