[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

[Joe MacDonald]

[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.05 (Thu 00:39) Bruce Ashfield wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe MacDonald <joe at deserted.net> wrote:
> > Actually, after all of that, I do have a couple of additional requests
> > (beyond just the tweak to the commit log).
> >
> >    Explicitly cc:ing Bruce here since I'm intentionally not adding
> >    meta-virt at .  I've gotten bounced from it in the past as I'm not a
> >    subscriber and it's subscriber-only.
> 
> :) I can't blame you for that, I share the pain (after bouncing off of oe-devel
> just a few days ago myself). Thanks for the cc.

*sigh*  I mean well.  I need to be a little less quick on sending an
email to ensure I've actually done (eg. added a cc) what I've claimed in
it.

> > [[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.02 (Mon 09:20) Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >
> >> 1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009,
> >> and a lot of things has changed since then.
> >>
> >> 2) More importantly, this software is more like for networking rather than
> >> virtualization, so I think it was misplaced.
> >
> > SOB please?
> >
> >> ---
> >>  .../recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb       | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Is this actually based on an OpenFlow 1.0 release, or has it always been
> > 1.0+git?  I don't have a copy of meta-virt around to check myself.  If
> > there was a real 1.0 recipe around, can we keep it as is and make this
> > openflow_git.bb, more in line with the other +git... recipes?
> 
> The meta-virt recipe had the same _1.0.bb extension, and it's SRCREV lines up
> with the openflow-1.0.0 tag in the repository:

I didn't know that.  In that case, the recipe naming makes sense to me.
I'm ambivalent when it comes to source tarballs versus git repos and
tags.  What I'm looking at makes sense though.  Thanks for the
clarification.

-J.

> 
> --------
> 
> commit 5ccca75a69f99791659bcfbcf35353ab1921320a
> Author: Glen Gibb <grg at stanford.edu>
> Date:   Thu Dec 31 16:00:53 2009 -0800
> 
>     docs: Update ChangeLog to include 1.0.0 information
> 
> :100644 100644 2f13dd7... aa0e92e... M  ChangeLog
> 
> -------
> 
> So it's definitely an option to keep that recipe around as the tagged 1.0, and
> create a _git that tracks newer changes (where "newer" is relative, 2011 is
> the latest commit in that repo).
> 
> Maybe someday, we'll get a working 1.x openflow to play with! :)
> 
> Thanks for holding on this briefly, it did help.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> >
> >>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..eb7770e
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> >> +SUMMARY = "OpenFlow"
> >> +DESCRIPTION = "Open standard that enables researchers to run experimental protocols in the campus networks"
> >> +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.openflow.org"
> >> +SECTION = "networking"
> >> +LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> >> +
> >> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=e870c934e2c3d6ccf085fd7cf0a1e2e2"
> >> +
> >> +SRCREV = "c84f33f09d5dbcfc9b489f64cb30475bf36f653a"
> >> +PV = "1.0+git${SRCPV}"
> >> +SRC_URI = "git://gitosis.stanford.edu/openflow.git;protocol=git"
> >> +
> >> +DEPENDS = "virtual/libc"
> >> +
> >> +EXTRA_OECONF += "KARCH=${TARGET_ARCH}"
> >> +
> >> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "libssl"
> >> +PACKAGECONFIG[libssl] = "--enable-ssl,--disable-ssl, openssl, libssl"
> >> +
> >> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> >> +
> >> +inherit autotools
> >> +
> >> +do_configure() {
> >> +    ./boot.sh
> >> +    oe_runconf
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +do_install_append() {
> >> +     # Remove /var/run as it is created on startup
> >> +    rm -rf ${D}${localstatedir}/run
> >> +}
> >
> > And while we're in the neighbourhood, can we also clean up the
> > inconsistent spacing?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > -Joe MacDonald.
> > :wq
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20130905/61a4cfa0/attachment-0002.sig>