[oe] [meta-oe][PATCHv2] libsoc: new recipe

[Paul Eggleton]

On Friday 13 September 2013 15:23:36 Jack Mitchell wrote:
> On 13/09/13 15:18, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 13-09-13 15:22, Jack Mitchell schreef:
> >> From: Jack Mitchell <jack at embed.me.uk>
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell <jack at embed.me.uk> ---
> >> 
> >> Change from v1: added signed-off-by
> >> 
> >> meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1
> >> file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644
> >> meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb
> >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb new file mode 100644 index
> >> 0000000..e91e152 --- /dev/null +++
> >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libsoc/libsoc_0.3.bb @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +SUMMARY
> >> = "libsoc is a C library for interfacing with common SoC peripherals
> >> through generic kernel interfaces" +HOMEPAGE =
> >> "https://github.com/jackmitch/libsoc" + +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1"
> >> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> >> "file://COPYING;md5=e0bfebea12a718922225ba987b2126a5" + +inherit
> >> autotools + +DEPENDS = "libgcc"
> > 
> > Isn't that automatically implied with gcc-cross?
> 
> I wasn't sure, so I thought I would stick it in and see if anyone piped
> up, I'll remove it in v3.
> 
> Also on that note I noticed that Apache2 also DEPENDS on libgcc, is that
> also wrong?

I don't know anything about this particular recipe, but IIRC, apache complains 
if libgcc is not installed at runtime, and at least when I added that to the 
recipe it was not being installed otherwise.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre