[oe] [meta-qt5][PATCH v5 2/2] packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target: include all modules for development

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Sat Apr 19 03:29:02 UTC 2014


On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/04/2014 12:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jonathan,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13/03/2014 1:01 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This adds the necessary target packages for development with all of the
>>>>> Qt 5 modules.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> | Computing transaction...error: Can't install
>>>> qtwayland-dev-5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0 at cortexa9hf_vfp_neon: no
>>>> package provides qtwayland = 5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0
>>>> |
>>>> | Saving cache...
>>>> |
>>>> | WARNING:
>>>>
>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/run.populate_sdk_image.29400:1
>>>> exit 1 from
>>>> |   smart --data-dir=${target_rootfs}/var/lib/smart install -y
>>>> ${pkgs_to_install}
>>>> | DEBUG: Python function do_populate_sdk finished
>>>> | ERROR: Function failed: populate_sdk_image (log file is located at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/lo
>>>>
>>>> Please fix this and test the combinations of enable/disable features.
>>>> They seem not well tested.
>>>>
>>> It looks like qtwayland is not being built properly in your configration.
>>>
>>> Can you provide configuration and steps to reproduce this failure?
>>> I have not had any luck in reproducing it.
>>
>> The wayland packages cannot be installed if wayland distro feature is
>> not available.
>>
> By default, DISTRO_FEATURES does not contain wayland so I wonder if it makes
> sense for to add wayland to DISTRO_FEATURES if it is not available.
> Is there a better method than checking if DISTRO_FEATURES has wayland for
> qtwayland?

You can check for x11 or wayland in this case. But I think qtwayland
is useless without wayland in distro features, isn't it?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list