[oe] [meta-qt5][PATCH v5 2/2] packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target: include all modules for development

[Otavio Salvador]

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/04/2014 1:29 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/04/2014 12:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Jonathan,
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13/03/2014 1:01 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This adds the necessary target packages for development with all of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Qt 5 modules.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> | Computing transaction...error: Can't install
>>>>>> qtwayland-dev-5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0 at cortexa9hf_vfp_neon: no
>>>>>> package provides qtwayland = 5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | Saving cache...
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | WARNING:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/run.populate_sdk_image.29400:1
>>>>>> exit 1 from
>>>>>> |   smart --data-dir=${target_rootfs}/var/lib/smart install -y
>>>>>> ${pkgs_to_install}
>>>>>> | DEBUG: Python function do_populate_sdk finished
>>>>>> | ERROR: Function failed: populate_sdk_image (log file is located at
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/lo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please fix this and test the combinations of enable/disable features.
>>>>>> They seem not well tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like qtwayland is not being built properly in your
>>>>> configration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide configuration and steps to reproduce this failure?
>>>>> I have not had any luck in reproducing it.
>>>>
>>>> The wayland packages cannot be installed if wayland distro feature is
>>>> not available.
>>>>
>>> By default, DISTRO_FEATURES does not contain wayland so I wonder if it
>>> makes
>>> sense for to add wayland to DISTRO_FEATURES if it is not available.
>>> Is there a better method than checking if DISTRO_FEATURES has wayland for
>>> qtwayland?
>>
>> You can check for x11 or wayland in this case. But I think qtwayland
>> is useless without wayland in distro features, isn't it?
>>
> I already do check for wayland in DISTRO_FEATURES before including qtwayland
> packages:
>
> ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'wayland', '${USE_WAYLAND}', '', d)}
>
> Is this not enough?
>
> I could perhaps change USE_RUBY, USE_WAYLAND, and USE_X11 to assign with ?=
> instead of = so that the packages depending on those can be excluded from
> the SDK if desired by setting them to "" in local.conf.

It is. I am rebuilding here and will debug it ...

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750