[oe] [meta-qt5][PATCH] qmake5_base.bbclass: Use Qt version specific paths

[Martin Jansa]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:22:03AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Martin,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:22:36AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> When looking for Qt5 components and files we ought to use the Qt5
> >> specific path. In case the distribution wants to have a flat tree it
> >> can set QT_DIR_NAME and it will still works as expected.
> >
> > NAK
> >
> > I don't think this is good idea, end-user applications shouldn't install
> > their data, archdata, examples etc in qt5 subdirectories.
> >
> > https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/wiki/Building-with-OE#wiki-bad-include-paths-and-build-failing-to-find-qt5-headers
> >
> > If you don't care about qt4/qt5 separation just set empty QT_DIR_NAME
> > and all qtmodules will fold into default directories and you won't need
> >
> > OE_QMAKE_PATH_HEADERS = "${OE_QMAKE_PATH_QT_HEADERS}"
> >
> > listed in above wiki.
> 
> and what about we change just the headers? I want to avoid every
> recipe using Qt5 and qmake to require setting the headers var.

That is still quite bad work around, because ideally end-user apps
shouldn't install headers in qt5 dirs as well.

So having this line explicitly in the recipe at least shows that app
headers will be installed in weird qt5 location (so your other recipes
should search for it there).
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20140220/ee9bbf6d/attachment-0002.sig>