[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 2/2] meta-python: move recipes from meta-oe

[Paul Eggleton]

On Thursday 17 July 2014 16:40:38 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:20:51PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 July 2014 07:07:01 Tim Orling wrote:
> > > Well, that's embarrassing. Thank you, Martin. Obviously, I forgot to
> > > push a
> > > local commit. I guess I'd better move to the back of the bus!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:32:34PM -0700, Tim Orling wrote:
> > > > >      * Move recipes from meta-openembedded/meta-oe that are not
> > > > >      
> > > > >        depended upon by recipes already in meta-oe (e.g. gateone,
> > > > >        anki)
> > > > >      
> > > > >      * Recipes NOT moved:
> > > > >        python-futures
> > > > >        python-pyopenssl
> > > > >        python-simplejson
> > > > >        python-tornado
> > > > >        python-pyqt
> > > > >        python-sip
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <TicoTimo at gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  .../recipes-devtools/python =>
> > > > >  meta-python/recipes-python}/pyrtm_0.2.bb
> > 
> > I just noticed, this doesn't fit the normal pattern of
> > recipes-xyz/something/*.bb - there's a missing directory level. It's
> > entirely cosmetic, but if we do want to fix it we ought to do so now.
> 
> I've fixed it already (in master-next) and it's not just cosmetic,
> because without the directory it's not included in BBFILES pattern.

I wasn't clear on what you'd fixed - I assumed you'd just changed BBFILES to 
match the structure rather than the other way around.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre