[oe] [OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] libav: add version 10.1
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Wed May 21 12:26:07 UTC 2014
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 12:14:26 Matthieu CRAPET wrote:
> I can understand the "maintenance" point of view. I've watched closely to
> the build system of the 3 versions, it's quite the same. 9.x adds more
> switches than 0.8.x and 10.x adds more switches than 9.x. As libav.inc is
> common, it deserves it. I've compiled the 3 versions with multiple
> (package)configs, and as far as tested, nothing is broken. Why not dropping
> 9.x a and keep 10.x (plus 0.8.x of course)?
The major version bumps are not just about additional switches though. If you
look at upstream-tracker.org [1] you can see that there were API/ABI-breaking
changes between 9 and 10 (and the libav project's version 10 announcement [2]
confirms this). The question is, for what we build in OE that depends upon
libav are these changes significant or not? If they are, are corresponding
upgrades available that are compatible with libav 10?
Cheers,
Paul
[1] http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libav.html
[2] https://libav.org/news.html#10final
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list