[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] sysdig: 0.1.101 -> 0.1.102

[Bian, Naimeng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem
> Raj
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 9:00 AM
> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] sysdig: 0.1.101 -> 0.1.102
> 
> 
> > On Aug 24, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Bian, Naimeng <biannm at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> >> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
> >> Of Khem Raj
> >> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 11:42 PM
> >> To: openembeded-devel
> >> Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] sysdig: 0.1.101 -> 0.1.102
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Bian Naimeng <biannm at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >>> upgrade sysdig to 0.1.102, and using GIT source instead of archive.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../01-donot-set-default-value-to-va_list.patch    | 22 --------------
> >>> meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig_0.1.101.bb  | 34
> >> ----------------------
> >>> meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig_git.bb      | 32
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)  delete mode
> >>> 100644
> >>> meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig/01-donot-set-default-value-to
> >>> -v
> >>> a_list.patch  delete mode 100644
> >>> meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig_0.1.101.bb
> >>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig_git.bb
> >>>
> >>> diff --git
> >>> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig/01-donot-set-default-value-
> >>> to
> >>> -va_list.patch
> >>> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig/01-donot-set-default-value-
> >>> to
> >>> -va_list.patch
> >>> deleted file mode 100644
> >>> index 9cb6378..0000000
> >>> ---
> >>> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/sysdig/sysdig/01-donot-set-default-value-
> >>> to
> >>> -va_list.patch
> >>> +++ /dev/null
> >>
> >> why is this patch dropped ?
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > Because this bug had been fixed at upstream before 0.1.102 released.
> > Obtain detail from here
> > https://github.com/draios/sysdig/commit/3cf4db08314b8559405198fb998eab
> > 421fec4b7d
> >
> 
> OK it would be nice to have this kind of information in commit message
> 

I got it, will be noted at next time.

Thanks
 Bian