[oe] [meta-java][PATCH] openjdk-8: fix rewrite QA warnings

[Jens Rehsack]

> Am 15.12.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br>:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 15.12.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br>:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Fix bitbake warnings from variable renaming like
>>>> 
>>>>   Variable key FILES_${PN} (${bindir}/* ${sbindir}/* ${libexecdir}/* ${libdir}/lib*${SOLIBS} ${sysconfdir} ${sharedstatedir} ${localstatedir} ${base_bindir}/* ${base_sbindir}/* ${base_libdir}/*${SOLIBS} ${base_prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d ${prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d ${datadir}/${BPN} ${libdir}/${BPN}/* ${datadir}/pixmaps ${datadir}/applications ${datadir}/idl ${datadir}/omf ${datadir}/sounds ${libdir}/bonobo/servers) replaces original key FILES_openjre-8 (    ${JRE_HOME}/bin/[a-z]*     ${JRE_HOME}/lib/[a-z]*     ${JRE_HOME}/LICENSE     ${JRE_HOME}/release ).
>>>> 
>>>> It is caused by using FILES_${PN} and FILES_{JDKPN} or FILES_${JREPN},
>>>> respectively. Moving FILES_{JDKPN} to openjdk-8_%.bb and FILES_${JREPN} to
>>>> openjre-8_%.bb to allow consequently use FILES_${PN}.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <sno at netbsd.org>
>>> 
>>> Looking at the proposed change, it seems it would be better to squash
>>> the JDK and JRE installation to a single recipe and do the proper
>>> split using the packaging.
>>> 
>>> Do you think this is reasonable?
>> 
>> I split openjdk-8/openjre-8 because of weird behavior wrt.
>> 
>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_java2-runtime = "openjdk-8-jre"
>> 
>> but I think with all the things I learned during packaging openjdk-8
>> and nqp/perl6 I can retry.
>> 
>> This will require lots of tests, so unfortunately it's unlikely
>> to manage it this year - maybe even not before our planned HP1 update
>> release.
> 
> Right; it is not a problem and I think this could be merged as an
> intermediate solution, in meanwhile.

Would be great.

> However I think consolidating it
> into a single recipe would give us some benefits as: faster builds,
> single recipe to manage, removal of .inc file at all.

Dunno how reasonable it is to install openjre and openjdk on on target,
so I don't see the faster builds. However - for dev or test targets:
*shrug* - I do my best to add no conflicts for most liberal use :)

Reducing .inc's is your favorite goal, isn't it? :D

Cheers
--
Jens Rehsack - rehsack at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20151215/8a944bf5/attachment-0002.sig>