[oe] [meta-python][PATCH 3/4] python-msgpack: add recipe

Thu Feb 19 18:10:10 UTC 2015

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:42:49PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ben Shelton <ben.shelton at ni.com> wrote:
> >> > python-msgpack implements the MessagePack binary serialization format
> >> > for Python.
> >> >
> >> > Copied from commit 91ed2353847d4121e3dd8ad10ca0c24194ac9765 in
> >> > meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack and updated to version 0.4.5.
> >>
> >> Can you elaborate on what is the use case for these recipes being cherry
> >> picked ?
> >
> > It was discussed on IRC yesterday, the use case is simple. Some project
> > needs couple python-* recipes and they happen to be available in
> > meta-openstack now.. so instead of adding dependency on whole
> > meta-openstack which has unwanted side-effects and a lot of stuff they
> > don't care about they move 4 recipes to meta-python.
> 
> Is there an IRC log someone can point me at ? IRC is an incredibly bad
> medium for looking up an old discussion. Sorry for not seeing it!

http://infobot.rikers.org/%23oe/20150218.html.gz

> Can someone also elaborate on 'unwanted side effects' ? Sounds like
> a bug, and something that can be fixed. Yanking recipes, not emailing
> the originators and citing bugs/issues without details .. really isn't a
> great way to foster collaboration and generally improve the ecosystem.
> 
> Again .. that's all that I'm saying. There's no harm in taking the extra
> time to document things a little bit, and offer explanations.
> 
> That's a valid reason for a move, but what I'm really asking for is
> that to be in
> the commit messages, and a description of the user. Having the floating
> set of recipes without a way to know how they are used and tested is
> going to cause a giant mess.
> 
> >
> >> If they are simply being moved "because they are python' .. that is annoying,
> >> and causes pain for dependent layers that have specific version dependencies.
> >
> > They are moved before different projects need them and meta-python is
> > best project-agnostic layer for python recipes.
> 
> No debate there. But again, we should simply log the reason in the original
> commit. There's no reason to lose that information to IRC and everyone's
> fading memory.
> 
> >
> >> I'm going to have to pin nearly all versions in the openstack layers and keep
> >> duplicate recipes around, so since I'm suffering that overhead, it would be nice
> >> if we could elaborate on the technical gain from doing this.
> >
> > You don't need to pin it if your layer has higher priority.
> 
> Yah. Paul mentioned that. I'll do that for now, since there will be
> times that the
> openstack variants are newer than the ones in meta-python, and that will
> handle both use cases.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bruce
> 
> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton at ni.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  .../recipes-devtools/python/python-msgpack_0.4.5.bb     | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-msgpack_0.4.5.bb
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-msgpack_0.4.5.bb b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-msgpack_0.4.5.bb
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..206b03d
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-msgpack_0.4.5.bb
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> >> > +DESCRIPTION = "MessagePack (de)serializer"
> >> > +HOMEPAGE = "https://pypi.python.org/pypi/msgpack-python/"
> >> > +SECTION = "devel/python"
> >> > +LICENSE = "Apache-2.0"
> >> > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=cd9523181d9d4fbf7ffca52eaa2a5751"
> >> > +
> >> > +PR = "r0"
> >> > +SRCNAME = "msgpack-python"
> >> > +
> >> > +SRC_URI = "https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/m/${SRCNAME}/${SRCNAME}-${PV}.tar.gz"
> >> > +
> >> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3b82bc542d5599896695512e7c32f42d"
> >> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a07cd6615a6bf38cfa2f010b121c7e77b74a3e7b971ef3e475c3d33308014cbb"
> >> > +
> >> > +S = "${WORKDIR}/${SRCNAME}-${PV}"
> >> > +
> >> > +inherit setuptools
> >> > --
> >> > 2.3.0
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >> > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> >> thee at its end"
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> > --
> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
> thee at its end"
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20150219/f85c19ed/attachment-0002.sig>