[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/7] wafsamba: add class
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Mon Jun 15 12:53:06 UTC 2015
Hi Bian,
On Monday 15 June 2015 16:52:10 Bian Naimeng wrote:
> wafsamba is a build system used by samba related software
>
> Signed-off-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm at cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> meta-oe/classes/wafsamba.bbclass | 55
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta-oe/classes/wafsamba.bbclass
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/wafsamba.bbclass
> b/meta-oe/classes/wafsamba.bbclass new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..764b530
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-oe/classes/wafsamba.bbclass
This should really be named waf-samba.bbclass. I'm also wondering how this
relates to waf.bbclass that we have in OE-Core - they do look quite different
though.
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +# waf is a build system which is used by samba related project.
> +# Obtain details from https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Waf
> +#
> +inherit qemu pythonnative
> +
> +DEPENDS += "qemu-native libxslt-native docbook-xsl-stylesheets-native
> python"
> +
> +CONFIGUREOPTS = " --prefix=${prefix} \
> + --bindir=${bindir} \
> + --sbindir=${sbindir} \
> + --libexecdir=${libexecdir} \
> + --datadir=${datadir} \
> + --sysconfdir=${sysconfdir} \
> + --sharedstatedir=${sharedstatedir} \
> + --localstatedir=${localstatedir} \
> + --libdir=${libdir} \
> + --includedir=${includedir} \
> + --oldincludedir=${oldincludedir} \
> + --infodir=${infodir} \
> + --mandir=${mandir} \
> + "
> +
> +do_configure() {
> + qemu_binary="${@qemu_target_binary(d)}"
> + if [ ${qemu_binary} == "qemu-allarch" ]; then
> + qemu_binary="qemuwrapper"
> + fi
> +
> + libdir_qemu="${STAGING_DIR_HOST}/${libdir}"
> + base_libdir_qemu="${STAGING_DIR_HOST}/${base_libdir}"
> + oldest_kernel_qemu=${OLDEST_KERNEL}
> +
> + CROSS_EXEC="${qemu_binary} \
> + -r ${oldest_kernel_qemu} \
> + -L ${STAGING_DIR_HOST} \
> + -E LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${libdir_qemu}:${base_libdir_qemu}"
> +
> + export BUILD_SYS=${BUILD_SYS}
> + export HOST_SYS=${HOST_SYS}
> + export BUILD_ARCH=${BUILD_ARCH}
> + export HOST_ARCH=${HOST_ARCH}
> + export STAGING_LIBDIR=${STAGING_LIBDIR}
> + export STAGING_INCDIR=${STAGING_INCDIR}
> + export PYTHONPATH=${STAGING_DIR_HOST}${PYTHON_SITEPACKAGES_DIR}
> +
> + ./configure ${CONFIGUREOPTS} ${EXTRA_OECONF} --cross-compile
> --cross-execute="${CROSS_EXEC}" +}
> +
> +do_compile () {
> + base_do_compile
> +}
Is this do_compile really needed? AFAICT this isn't doing anything because
base_do_compile will already be being run by way of EXPORT_FUNCTIONS.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list