[oe] [meta-browser][PATCH 1/2 V4] cef3: Add recipe for Chromium Embedded Framework

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri May 1 15:47:55 UTC 2015


ping. Can this now be merged ?

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2015 10:37 AM, "Carlos Rafael Giani" <dv at pseudoterminal.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about the
>> heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but these days we don't have multiple
>> chromium versions in meta-browser, so it is okay.
>> The shared object versioning bandaid wasn't done by me, I modified other
>> parts, but I agree with the patch. The way it is done now is cleaner.
>> Have you come across a case where there were codec package conflicts?
>>
>
> Not yet but this makes it future proof. Since I know there are packages with
> same .so
>>
>>
>> Am 2015-04-27 um 23:40 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccurdy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous
>>>>> versions of the patch?
>>>>>
>>>>>   - dubious indent in do_install()
>>>>>   - .pak files being installed as executables
>>>>>   - dev-so INSANE_SKIP shouldn't be requied
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for bringing it up. I will send a followup to fix it
>>>> incrementally.
>>>
>>> Please wait for Carlos comments and send a new pathc revision. This is
>>> not yet merged so fixes are still possible.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list