[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 01/20] smstools: fix PN -> BPN for multilib

[Martin Jansa]

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:19:06PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 05/12/15 10:45, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> On Monday 11 May 2015 11:27:04 Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:42:16PM +0800, Yi Zhao wrote:
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao at windriver.com>
> >>> Changes 03, 18, 20 didn't make it to patchwork, because they were marked
> >>> as Spam by gmail
> >> Hang on, I'm confused. Why should the patches being marked as spam in gmail 
> >> have any bearing on whether they should show up in patchwork? Surely gmail 
> >> shouldn't be involved in the sending part, only subsequently when the mail is 
> >> sent from the mailing list to you (since you use gmail)?
> > Isn't patchwork reading some gmail account over imap?
> >
> > The list of patches not appearing in patchwork is exactly matching with
> > patches marked as spam in my inbox, so I believe that the same is
> > happening in patchwork's gmail account.
> 
> Does anyone know if it helps when I notice them in "Spam" and mark them
> as "Not Spam"?

It helps in my gmail account (some patches probably still marked as spam
in patchwork weren't marked as spam in my gmail folder), but maybe it
needs more time to propagate into other account or it needs more people
to mark it as such.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com