[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] samba: fix dependencies and QA issues

[Jens Rehsack]

> Am 11.11.2015 um 19:47 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 19:07 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> grep remains silent regarding DISTRO_FEATURES and linuxstdbase :(
>>> 
>>> right, its a OVERRIDE so you can do something like
>>> 
>>> foo_linuxstdbase = .....
>> 
>> And? That's why? ...
>> 
>> I still don't get your initial argument why the PACKAGEOPTION shall not be named lsb,
>> when init support based on lsb is added by it.
> 
> my only ask was that if I have linuxstdbase in overrides then I should
> get lsb behaviour enabled for this package automatically weather its
> PACKAGRECONFIG or not. and similarly disabled when I dont have it in
> my distro overrides

In this special case I intend to say no, because:

  The lsb support is limited to startup only - and the distro features
  controlling startup are "sysvinit" and "systemd", respectively.

Mixing systemd with linuxstdbase in overrides is possible but installing
two init-script not knowing each other is likely asking for trouble. Maybe
I'm wrong with that :)

Cheers
-- 
Jens Rehsack - rehsack at gmail.com